Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Art. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Art. Mostrar todas las entradas

jueves, 25 de febrero de 2016

The most expensive paintings and reasons for buying

The most expensive paintings in the world why some people pay so much for them?


When there are art auctions, public or private, fabulous sums are paid for a work of art. Of millions or tens of millions years about 25 years ago, now known prices expressed in hundreds of millions of dollars. Are they worth both these works really?
A work of art has an intrinsic value that is based on the quality of work, the car, the related facts, creation time, legends and other own details. Extrinsic value refers to the market value also considers the intrinsic value, the profit margin set by the sellers after a marketing job that creates and maximizes expectations, identifying potential buyers and end sales process .

Usually, the galleries form a kind of cartel by which set in secret, the transaction values ​​and even appear to act independently, they share inside information about prospective customers and other details. "Production" (ie, works of art) gradually take them to market.



In the art market, supply is fixed and demand is shifted to the right so that equilibrium is achieved at higher prices. Vendors or dealers have discovered the mechanism for causing the curve to shift well and equilibrate at very high prices. One is the identification of buyers who do not want the artwork itself but for other reasons.



The following chart shows that genuine interest in the work of art, the artist's work, from the emotional connotation that entails, is inversely related to the wreck paid. A normal person can offer an increasingly high price for a good job, but there is a limit not exceeding. If you can not buy it with the resources available, and although it does is frustrated, not you get sick of it.



It is also true that the more valuable or expensive is the work, there is greater enjoyment for possession and the possibility of contemplation, but also there is a limit of saturation. Obviously a work of art, painting and sculpture, low price does not generate as much satisfaction as the work more expensive. In the first case, can be works of students, early work and testing of a great artist; in the second case are the work of the senior artist, the artwork can have a legend behind a series of events that increase the intrinsic value.

People have a need to constantly increase the level of satisfaction, but everything has a limit. There is a price at which, and no additional joy is experienced. It's like wine. You can be the best wine in the world, the most expensive, but after a certain number of glasses, does not feel it or think about the unique qualities.

Pc critical last price, the buyer no longer values ​​the work of art in itself but related to the transaction as satisfying to have more money than others (economic power) facts, displace other competitors (personal power), by be the holder of a work coveted by many; it is very foreign to what you expect from a true art lover reasons.



The following figure shows the degree of distortion is observed in the assessment of the work of art in relation to the price. The higher the price, this distortion is increased. In the first part, before the saturation limit, the share of the demand curve D shows the normal behavior in which you pay extra to have the ownership of a work of art that is meaningful to the buyer. The buyer is satisfied by to admire your artwork.

On the demand curve D1, the distortion is evident in the behavior of the buyer. is not satisfied with the work of art in itself, but the knowledge of owning property, a valuable object. The buyer is satisfied for comparing a work of art, no matter who is not representing. They do not care a painting by Giotto, the Mona Lisa or a work of Picasso.

On the demand curve D2, the dominant feeling in the buyer is no longer even the possession of a valuable object with aesthetic content, but the feeling of raw power, the euphoria has to have shifted to other competitors, perhaps with some of them it was in direct competition now and savor his triumph.

D3 demand, the distortion is high. The move prosaic interests absolutely everybody that relates to art. Here the pleasure of paying more than all, the possibility of increasing wealth selling this work to others (speculation) is identified. Other less healthy intentions as money laundering also covers. It is not uncommon for many valuable works of art are in the hands of individuals or heads of groups outside the law.

In any case, it is true that almost none of them appreciate the intrinsic value of the work that will be saved in their armored tanks, none of them has the sensitivity to appreciate the colors, shapes, contrasts or facts about these works. They bought a very expensive object and keep a time to sell it at a profit.



-de-todos-los-tiempos.blogspot.pe/2016/02/10-10-1.html     

lunes, 22 de febrero de 2016

Arte e racismo, as palavras e arte

Arte e o racismo, a hipocrisia ou uma decisão acertada


Fundo

Existe o racismo, o tratamento desdenhoso, a discriminação onde as palavras esquimós anãs negras são utilizados nas etiquetas de arte? É ofensivo se for nomeado para as pessoas que foram objecto de um trabalho artístico em pintura, escultura ou outra forma? É politicamente correto para evitar termos como "ofensiva"?

O Rijksmuseum Amsterdam alterado 2016-300 títulos de livros para evitar conflito palavras consideradas como 'black', 'Anão', 'Moor' ou 'muçulmano'. Especialmente se as obras são derivadas da era colonial ", como parte de um projeto que visa evitar palavras (até 23), como preto, kaffir, indiana e outra depreciativa considerado. O plano não é fácil, porque a busca de alternativas requer encontrar denominações precisos até meados de 2016.

Há títulos como Black Senhora nova (1895-1922), uma pintura pelo artista holandês Simon Maris (1873-1935) fácil de se adaptar ao idioma atual.


Menina negra '(1895-1922), uma pintura pelo artista holandês Simon Maris.

A linguagem é traiçoeiro e às vezes as coisas não significa que eles dizem. As instituições públicas devem ter um cuidado especial no uso de alguns termos que possam ofender sensibilidades. Por exemplo, evite palavras  tão difundida como Eskimo ou Jíbaro. "Para eles Eskimo é pejorativo, significa comedor de carne crua. Inuit usar, o que significa personalidade, e é como se a si mesmos ".

Em outros centros famosos a resposta é variada. O Museu Britânico diz que "não há planos para mudar os títulos de qualquer das suas partes no momento." National Gallery de Londres, por outro lado, diz que "constantemente verificando os rótulos e descrições" de suas obras. Também observa que fazer "as mudanças necessárias em resposta a diferentes razões." A National Portrait Gallery, em Londres, descreve como "muito interessante o que o Rijksmuseum, mas não pode ser aplicada aos nossos retratos, que muitas vezes carregam o nome do modelo".

Os tempos mudam, as línguas mudam, algumas palavras permanecem e outros são relegados. Para aqueles que são o significado muda por causa de novas circunstâncias. A palavra inquisição mais de 500 anos atrás teria feito tremer de medo nenhum de nós, agora que a palavra evoca uma organização criminosa e criminal, cujo objetivo real era expropriar a riqueza de honesto e produtivo. Uma variação da máfia siciliana ou a Yakuza japonesa. Outros termos, tais como o touro de excomunhão também poderia ter causado ataques cardíacos pelo medo, agora só um documento soa brega, cheio de porcaria e sem sentido palavras. Por mais ridículo que se anunciam em um documento as mortes de animais de estimação, rei de uma ilha remota no Oceano Pacífico.

Quando as palavras valem mais do que a arte

Da mesma forma, o significado pejorativo ou discriminador atribuídos às palavras que ser removido mudou e não é típico da época. 150 anos atrás, que mencionou a palavra pretas membros talvez tenha sido colonialista de exploração considerados desta comunidade como uma mercadoria que pode ser comprado ou vendido, e sua mente conseguia identificar o desprezo, um sentimento de superioridade e outros aspectos negativos. Hoje, a palavra preto somente nos faz pensar de pessoas de um grupo étnico diferente, nada mais.

Em termos de expressão artística, uma pessoa educada para entender e apreciar a arte com sensibilidade e julgamento para avaliar o valor intrínseco da obra de arte, não se importa se uma pessoa branca aparece, preto, oriental em um retrato; ele apenas aprecia o tratamento artístico, luz e sombra, proporção. Considera-se trabalho artístico. Da mesma forma, Elvis Presley 150 anos atrás, nunca teria coragem de executar publicamente com escravos negros; 50 anos Presley alimentado música negra para criar o seu que gostava do estilo preto e branco.

A intenção de mudar as palavras soa mais como a hipocrisia, uma falsa polidez, concessões espúrias de lobistas com interesses políticos, a apresentação de interesse artístico e intenção de interesses mundanos.

Em uma obra de arte, se o retrato pertence a um negro, uma pessoa com cultura artística não menosprezar o trabalho, se é de boa qualidade. Se o retrato é de uma pessoa branca é pobre, que têm um interesse genuíno na arte não superestimar este trabalho.

A arte tem o seu próprio lugar

O artista negro Kerry Marshall (eu não acho que politicamente incorreto falar) pinta retratos de seu povo, e esteticamente não passar os testes que coloca uma mensagem de reivindicação. Mesmo nos títulos de suas obras, a palavra "negro" é exibida. Você está desorientado ou confuso? Você não sabe o que a palavra "ofender" o seu povo? Não, o apresenta a sua proposta visual, artística; Não literária, linguística ou verbal.


Jame Kerry Marshall, nascido em 1955, Alabama; Estados Unidos


Kerry Marshall Jame. meninos perdidos AKA Preto Johnny, 1993. Cortesia do artista. Jack Shainman Gallery, NY, e Koplin Del Rio, CA

Para retratos e outros trabalhos onde os negros ou outros grupos humanos aparecem, se o artista tinha em mente o sentido depreciativo da palavra "negro" ou ter associado com os seus modelos com pessoas inferiores não teria sido disposto a agarrar nobreza, feições delicadas, o contraste de luz e sombra, e criar a beleza que nós admiramos nestes retratos. Se Simon Maris tinha pensado como colonialista ou do operador, ele poderia ter obtido uma visão grotesca e não o belo retrato é observado.

No momento em que essas obras foram criadas, havia bons homens brancos e muito mau, ele ainda aparece hoje; mas existem algumas boas preto e outros muito mal com o seu próprio povo. Então, qual é a diferença? A arte é sobre o significado das palavras.

Referências

Kerry James Marshall: pintura y otras cosas

La corrección política entra en el museo, 8 d enero del 2016
http://cultura.elpais.com/cultura/2016/01/04/actualidad/1451900746_779078.html

Art et le racisme, les mots et l'art

Art et le racisme, l'hypocrisie ou une bonne décision


Fond

Y at-il le racisme, le traitement méprisant, une discrimination lorsque les naines mots esquimaux noirs sont utilisés sur les étiquettes de l'art? Est-ce offensive si elle est nommé pour les personnes qui ont fait l'objet d'un travail artistique dans la peinture, la sculpture ou une autre forme? Est-il politiquement correct pour éviter des termes tels que "offensive"?

Le Rijksmuseum Amsterdam a modifié 2016-300 titres de livres pour éviter tout conflit mots considérés comme «noir», «nain», «Moor» ou «musulman». Surtout si les œuvres sont issues de l'époque coloniale, "dans le cadre d'un projet qui vise à éviter les mots (jusqu'à 23) en tant que noir, cafre, indiennes et autres dérogatoire considéré. Le plan est pas facile, parce que la recherche d'alternatives, il faut trouver appellations précises jusqu'à la mi-2016.

Il y a des titres comme Black Jeune femme (1895 à 1922), une peinture de l'artiste néerlandais Simon Maris (1873-1935) qui est facile à adapter à la langue courante.


fille noire »(1895-1922), un tableau de l'artiste néerlandais Simon Maris.

La langue est traître et parfois les choses ne signifie pas qu'ils disent. Les institutions publiques devraient porter une attention particulière à l'utilisation de certains termes qui peuvent heurter les sensibilités. Par exemple, éviter les mots comme si répandue Eskimo ou Jíbaro. "Pour eux Eskimo est péjoratif, signifie mangeur de viande crue. Inuits utilisent, ce qui signifie la personnalité, et il est comme eux ".

Dans d'autres centres célèbres la réponse est variée. Le British Museum dit que "pas l'intention de changer les titres de l'une de ses parties à l'heure actuelle." National Gallery de Londres, d'autre part, dit "constamment vérifier les étiquettes et les descriptions» de ses œuvres. Note également que font "les changements nécessaires en réponse à différentes raisons." La National Portrait Gallery à Londres, décrit comme «très intéressant ce que le Rijksmuseum, mais ne peut pas être appliquée à nos portraits, qui portent souvent le nom de modèle".

Les temps changent, les langues changent, certains mots restent et d'autres sont relégués. Pour ceux qui sont les changements de sens en raison de nouvelles circonstances. Le mot inquisition il y a plus de 500 ans aurait fait trembler de crainte qu'aucun d'entre nous, maintenant ce mot évoque une organisation criminelle et pénale, dont le vrai but était d'exproprier la richesse de honnête et productive. Une variante de la mafia sicilienne ou les Yakuza japonais. D'autres termes, comme la bulle d'excommunication pourraient également avoir causé des crises cardiaques par la peur, maintenant seulement un document semble collante, plein de merde et de non-sens des mots. Aussi ridicule que si nous annonçons dans un document les décès d'animaux de compagnie, roi d'une île isolée dans l'océan Pacifique.

Quand les mots valent plus que l'art

De même, le sens péjoratif ou discriminateur attribués à des mots à supprimer a changé et est pas typique de l'époque. Il y a 150 ans, qui a mentionné le mot noir peut-être qu'il a été colonialiste exploitation considérés comme des membres de cette communauté comme une marchandise pouvant être achetée ou vendue, et son esprit pourrait identifier mépris, un sentiment de supériorité et d'autres aspects négatifs. Aujourd'hui, le mot noir seulement nous fait penser à des personnes d'un groupe ethnique différent, rien de plus.

En termes d'expression artistique, une personne éduquée pour comprendre et apprécier l'art avec la sensibilité et le jugement pour examiner la valeur intrinsèque de l'œuvre d'art, ne se soucie pas si une personne blanche apparaît, noir, oriental dans un portrait; il apprécie simplement le traitement artistique, ombre et lumière, proportion. Il est jugé l'œuvre d'art elle-même. De même, Elvis Presley il y a 150 ans aurait jamais osé exécuter publiquement avec des esclaves noirs; 50 ans Presley nourris musique noire pour créer votre qui aimait le style noir et blanc.

L'intention de changer les mots ressemble plus à l'hypocrisie, une fausse politesse, concessions parasites pour les lobbyistes ayant des intérêts politiques, la présentation d'un intérêt artistique et l'intention d'intérêts mondains.

Dans une œuvre d'art, si le portrait appartient à un noir, une personne avec la culture artistique ne sera pas déprécier le travail si elle est de bonne qualité. Si le portrait est d'une personne de race blanche, il est pauvre, qui ont un intérêt réel dans l'art pas surestimer ce travail.

L'art a sa place

L'artiste noir Kerry Marshall (je ne pense pas qu'il est politiquement incorrect de parler) peint des portraits de son peuple, et esthétiquement pas passer les tests qui met un message de confirmation. Même dans les titres de ses œuvres, le mot «noir» apparaît. Êtes-vous désorienté ou confus? Vous ne savez pas ce mot "offenser" leur peuple? Non, le présente son visuel, proposition artistique; pas littéraire, linguistique ou verbale.


Jame Kerry Marshall, né en 1955, Alabama; United States


Kerry Marshall Jame. garçons perdus Alias ​​Noir Johnny, 1993. Avec l'aimable autorisation de l'artiste. Jack Shainman Gallery, New York, et Koplin Del Rio, CA

Pour les portraits et autres emplois où les Noirs ou d'autres groupes humains apparaissent, si l'artiste avait eu à l'esprit le sens péjoratif du mot «noir» ou ont associé à leurs modèles avec des gens inférieurs aurait pas été prêts à saisir noblesse, des traits fins, le contraste de la lumière et de l'ombre, et de créer de la beauté que nous admirons dans ces portraits. Si Simon Maris avait pensé que colonialiste ou l'exploitant, il aurait pu obtenir une vision grotesque et pas le beau portrait est observé.

Au moment où ces œuvres ont été créées, il y avait de bons hommes blancs et très méchant, il apparaît encore aujourd'hui; mais il y a quelque chose de bon noir et d'autres très mal par son propre peuple. Alors, quelle est la différence? L'art est sur le sens des mots.

Références

Kerry James Marshall: pintura y otras cosas

La corrección política entra en el museo, 8 d enero del 2016

Art and racism, the words and art

Art and racism, hypocrisy or a right decisión


Background
Is there racism, contemptuous treatment, discrimination where the black dwarf Eskimo words are used on the labels of art? Is it offensive if it is named for the people who were the subject of an artistic work in painting, sculpture or another form? Is it politically correct to avoid such terms as "offensive"?

The Rijksmuseum Amsterdam amended 2016-300 book titles to avoid conflicting words considered as 'black', 'Dwarf', 'Moor' or 'Moslem'. Especially if the works are derived from the colonial era, "as part of a project that aims to avert words (up to 23) as black, Kaffir, Indian and other derogatory considered. The plan is not easy, because the search for alternatives requires finding precise appellations until mid-2016.

There are titles like Black Young lady (1895-1922), a painting by the Dutch artist Simon Maris (1873-1935) easy to adapt to the current language.


black girl '(1895-1922), a painting by the Dutch artist Simon Maris.

The language is treacherous and sometimes things not mean they say. Public institutions should take special care in the use of some terms that may offend sensitivities. For example, avoid words like so widespread Eskimo or jíbaro. "For them Eskimo is pejorative, means raw meat eater. Inuit use, which means personality, and it's like themselves ".

In other famous centers the answer is varied. The British Museum says that "no plans to change the titles of any of its parts at this time." London's National Gallery, on the other hand, says "constantly checking the labels and descriptions" of his works. Also notes that make "the necessary changes in response to different reasons." The National Portrait Gallery in London, describes as "very interesting what the Rijksmuseum, but can not be applied to our portraits, which often carry the model name".

Times change, change languages, some words remain and others are relegated. For those who are the meaning changes because of new circumstances. The word inquisition over 500 years ago would have made you tremble with fear any of us, now that word evokes a criminal and criminal organization, whose real purpose was to expropriate the wealth of honest and productive. A variation of the Sicilian Mafia or the Japanese Yakuza. Other terms, such as the bull of excommunication might also have caused heart attacks by fear, now only a document sounds tacky, full of crap and nonsense words. As ridiculous as if we announce in a document the deaths of pets king of a remote island in the Pacific Ocean.

When words are worth more than art

Similarly, the derogatory meaning or attributed to the words to be removed discriminator has changed and is not typical of the era. 150 years ago, who mentioned the word black perhaps it was exploitative colonialist considered members of this community as a commodity that could be bought or sold, and his mind could identify contempt, a feeling of superiority and other negative aspects. Today, the black word only makes us think of people from a different ethnic group, nothing more.

In terms of artistic expression, a person educated to understand and appreciate art with sensitivity and judgment to review the intrinsic value of the work of art, does not care if a white person appears, black, oriental in a portrait; he just appreciates the artistic treatment, light and shadow, proportion. It is judged the artwork itself. Similarly, Elvis Presley 150 years ago never would has dared to perform publicly with black slaves; 50 years Presley fed black music to create his music style who liked black and white.

The intention to change the words sounds more like hypocrisy, a false politeness, spurious concessions for lobbyists with political interests, the submission of artistic interest and intention to mundane interests.

In a work of art, if the portrait belongs to a black, a person with artistic culture will not belittle the work if it is of good quality. If the portrait is of a white person it is poor, who have genuine interest in art not overestimate this work.

Art has its own place

The black artist Kerry Marshall (I do not think it politically incorrect to speak so) paints portraits of his people, and aesthetically not pass the tests that puts a message of vindication. Even in the titles of his works the word "black" appears. Are he disoriented or confused? Does he do not know that word "offend" their people? No, he presents its visual, artistic proposal; not literary, linguistic or verbal.



Jame Kerry Marshall, born in 1955, Alabama; United States


Kerry Marshall Jame. Lost boys AKA Black Johnny, 1993. Courtesy of the artist. Jack Shainman Gallery, NY, and Koplin Del Rio, CA

For portraits and other jobs where blacks or other human groups appear, if the artist had had in mind the derogatory sense of the word "black" or have associated with their models with inferior people would not have been willing to grasp nobility, delicate features, contrast of light and shadow, and create the beauty that we admire in these portraits. If Simon Maris had thought as colonialist or operator, he might have obtained a grotesque vision and not the beautiful portrait is observed.

At the time that these artworks were created, there were good white men and very wicked, it still appears today; but there are some good black and other very evil with his own people. So what's the difference? Art is over the meaning of words.

References

Kerry James Marshall: pintura y otras cosas

La corrección política entra en el museo, 8 d enero del 2016